These reports and data cover the results of inspections under:
The Environmental Management Act (EMA), which regulates:
The Integrated Pest Management Act (IPMA), which regulates:
​Both the EMA and IPMA provide powers and authority for ministry staff to:
Administrative Penalties (APs) are financial penalties that can be given to encourage parties to come into compliance.
January to March 2025
The City of Prince Rupert received an $18,460 administrative penalty for failing to inspect and maintain their wastewater system. This resulted in multiple effluent pipe leaks and discharges of raw sewage to waterbodies.
GFL Environmental Inc. received a $22,200 administrative penalty for allowing compost leachate to be discharged to the environment. The leachate had the potential to negatively affect aquatic species.
October to December 2024
Conuma Resources Limited received 3 administrative penalties totaling $7,000 for non-compliances related to:
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3
Walter Yee Lee and Mei Yan Lee received two administrative penalties totaling $29,240 for not complying with a Remediation Order to remediate a parcel of land they own that was previously a dry cleaning operation.
Conuma Resources Limited received a $7,830 administrative penalty for storing more hazardous wastes than is allowed under the Environmental Management Act.
Deep Water Recovery Ltd., who operate a ship breaking company, received a $26,700 administrative penalty for allowing waste to enter the environment without an authorization.
Deep Water Recovery Ltd., who operate a ship breaking company, received a $19,450 administrative penalty for failing to comply with the requirements in the Pollution Abatement Order issued to them on March 15, 2024. The requirements included immediately ceasing discharge of effluent with concentrations of Copper, Lead and Zinc above BC Water Quality Guideline (BC WQG) levels to the environment.
Pacific Coast Renewables Corp. (formerly Net Zero Waste Abbotsford Inc.) received four administrative penalties totaling $119,695 for non-compliances with their authorization. This included failing to:
This is the third administrative penalty package for this site.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3, 4
Telegraph Cove Resorts Ltd. received two administrative penalties totaling $17,940 for non-compliances related to their wastewater discharge authorization. The non-compliances included failing to:
G.T. Farms Ltd. carries out agricultural activities, including dairy farming, near Cobble Hill. They have been issued 5 administrative penalties totaling $70,100 for contraventions with the Code of Practice for Agricultural Environmental Management between November of 2022 and February of 2024. These administrative penalties are for non-compliances related to:
This is the second administrative penalty for the Thain site operations.
Administrative Penalty 1,2,3,4,5
G.T. Farms Ltd. Hillbank site operations, near Cobble Hill, has been issued 3 administrative penalties totalling $17,100 for:
This is the second administrative penalty for the Hillbank site operations.
Fraser Valley Renewables Ltd. (FVR) has been issued an $8,000 administrative penalty for:
During the penalty period, FVR was issued a Pollution Prevention Order from the Ministry of Environment and a Stop Work Order from the Agricultural Land Commission. All waste material has since been removed from the site.
Two warnings for the same non-compliances were issued in 2022.
E.J. Blackwell Holdings Ltd. operates a private landfill near Kamloops. After a November 2023 inspection, they have been issued a $15,000 administrative penalty for discharging types of waste not authorized under their permit.
E.J. Blackwell Holdings Ltd. was fined $10,000 after prosecution in 2012 and warned twice about accepting waste types that are not authorized.
Jaydan Ventures Inc. has been issued 2 administrative penalties totaling $58,900 for contraventions of the Municipal Wastewater Regulation at the Blind Bay Resort including:
Jayden was previously warned about both contraventions.
Peter Morris received a $6,000 administrative penalty for non-compliances under the Open Burning Smoke Control Regulation including:
Greenhills Holdings Corp. received a $80,000 administrative penalty for:
July to September 2024
Allied Salvage & Metals (1985) Ltd. received two administrative penalties (AP) for allowing effluent generated at their metal recycling facilities to enter the environment. The effluent was discharged to the City of Richmond’s storm sewer system which drains to the Fraser River.
Mercer Celgar Pulp Ltd. received two administrative penalties totalling $24,000 for failing to:
Ground X Site Services Ltd. received a $150,000 administrative penalty for the unauthorized discharge of effluent on two occasions:
Samples of the effluent found it exceeded BC Water Quality Guidelines for multiple parameters including arsenic, chromium, lead, coliforms and hydrocarbons.
Parastone Developments Ltd. received a $5,500 administrative penalty for non-compliances with the Open Burn Regulation including:
Purity Feed received a $2,700 administrative penalty for non-compliances with the Integrated Pest Management Regulation including failing to:
They previously received an advisory and warnings for the same non-compliances.
Launch Construction Ltd. received a $3,000 administrative penalty for non-compliances with the Open Burn Regulation including burning:
Nicola Mining Inc. (NMI) received 4 administrative penalties totaling $186,940 for non-compliances at their Treasure Mountain Mine. The non-compliances included failing to:
NMI has received 3 administrative penalties for the same non-compliances.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3, 4
Regional District of Kitimat-Stikine (RDKS) received a $10,000 administrative penalty for non-compliances related to the operation of their Meziadin Landfill. The non-compliances included failing to:
The RDKS received warnings in 2020 and 2021 for the same non-compliances.
Teck Coal Limited (Teck) received two administrative penalties totaling $220,750 for non-compliances at their Elkview Operations site. The non-compliances included discharging process slurry from it’s coal processing plant to the ground 27 times and to surface water twice.
Teck was previously issued a $198,000 AMP in May 2022 for the same non-compliances.
Pacific Abrasives & Supply Inc. operates an abrasives processing facility in Grand Forks. They received a $130,000 administrative penalty for failing to suppress fugitive dust between July of 2020 and December of 2022 from their operation which is close to residential areas. This is the third administrative penalty issued to the company for dust related non-compliances.
Complaints of a structure fire on Cortes Island in February of 2022 lead to John Vosper being issued a $3,500 administrative penalty for burning prohibited material (construction and demolition debris). Vosper admitted that burning construction debris was less expensive than landfilling.
Fertoz International Organic Inc. operates two phosphate rock mines east of Fernie and was issued three administrative penalties totalling $24,700:
Fertoz International Organic Inc. had previously received a warning in 2019.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3
Hemlock Utility Services Ltd. provides sanitary services to Sasquatch Mountain Resort near Chilliwack. They were issued five administrative penalties totalling $86,500 for;
These non-compliances happened between July 2022 and May of 2023. A warning was previously issued in June of 2022.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Huldra Properties Inc operates the Craigmont Mine near Merritt. They have been issued a $16,100 administrative penalty for not submitting an updated groundwater monitoring program before restarting discharges to their tailings facility in March of 2023. Another $1,800 was fined for failing to report non-compliances to the ministry between March and October of 2023. This is the second administrative penalty issued for the same failures to comply.
In December 2023, after multiple complaints were received about visible flames, breathing issues and headaches from a toxic smell near Burns Lake, Christian Weller was found burning insulation, plastics, furniture and other prohibited materials on their property. An $11,875 administrative penalty was issued for burning prohibited material aggravated by human health impacts.
The Cooper Mountain Mine near Princeton received two administrative penalties. The first was $11,500 for 16 non-compliances of total copper concentrations in Wolfe Creek and a second was issued for $1,600 for the failure to immediately notify the ministry of non-compliances with their permit between April 2021 and June 2022. Administrative penalties have been previously issued for failure to comply.
After receiving complaints of a structure fire at an orchard near Erickson in May of 2023, Kiranpal Sandhu was found to be the responsible person who directed workers to burn an old structure that contained prohibited materials including shingles, wire, appliances and metal. A $3,500 administrative penalty was issued to Kiranpal Sandhu, who had been previously provided with information on what prohibited materials are by the Creston Fire Department.
Channel Ridge Environmental Systems Ltd. operates a private sewage treatment system on Salt Spring Island. They were issued 3 administrative penalties totalling $32,793 for non-compliances with authorized works, receiving environment monitoring and reporting. Warnings for the same non-compliances were issued in 2019 and 2021.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3
Gavin Mines Inc, who owns the Dome Mountain Mine near Smithers, was fined $9,000 for failing to fully analyze 32 monthly samples for all parameters between June 1, 2021 and January 1, 2023. This is the second administrative penalty for this non-compliance.
Global Pet Food Stores Inc. was issued a $200 administrative penalty for failing to provide an officer information requested to conduct an inspection in February of 2024. A warning for failing to provide information was issued in December of 2023.
April to June 2024
Teck Coal Limited received a $13,500 administrative penalty for thirteen unauthorized discharges of hydrocarbons between January 5th and July 4th, 2021, at their Fording River Operations location.
The Cowichan Valley Regional District received two administrative penalties totalling $3,338 for non-compliances at their wastewater treatment plant, including failing to:
They received a warning for the same non-compliances in 2021.
Canadian Timberframes Ltd. received a $20,283 administrative penalty for discharging air contaminants from an unauthorized baghouse and cyclone from March 2022 to April 2024.
They received an administrative penalty in 2022 for the same non-compliances.
Waves Coffee Inc. received a $30,891 administrative penalty for non-compliances under the Recycling Regulation including failing to:
Waves Coffee received a warning for the same non-compliances in 2023.
Conrad Schiebel received a $1,500 administrative penalty for burning prohibited material included demolition waste, electrical wiring, fibreglass, plastics, polystyrene foam, and rubber at his Turtle Valley Bison Ranch.
United Concrete and Gravel Ltd. received an $18,281 administrative penalty for discharging air emissions from four unauthorized sources at its concrete and glass abrasives manufacturing facility. They received warnings in 2019 and 2020 for the same non-compliances.
Conuma Resource Limited, which operates a coal mine near Chetwynd, received a $4,750 administrative penalty for:
These non-compliances occurred between December 2020 and December 2022.
Conuma Resource Limited, which operates a coal mine near Chetwynd, received two administrative penalties totaling $41,100. This was for failing to:
These non-compliances occurred between October 2020 and March 2023.
The City of Chilliwack, which owns and operates the Bailey Sanitary Landfill, received an $11,000 administrative penalty for non-compliance with their authorization including:
They received an advisory for the same issues in 2022.
Harbourside Lodge Bamfield Ltd. received 3 administrative penalties totaling $17,722 for failing to:
They received a warning in 2018 for the same non-compliances.
Administrative penalty 1, 2, 3
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. (BGM) received a $9,870 administrative penalty for failing to:
BGM was warned in 2019 and 2021 for the same non-compliances.
Sandher Fruit Packers Ltd. received a $78,368 administrative penalty for unauthorized discharge of effluent from their fruit packing operation. Sandher received a violation ticket in 2018 and a $32,000 administrative penalty in 2022 for the same non-compliance.
Howe Sound Pulp & Paper Corporation received two administrative penalties totaling $22,000 for:
Howe Sound received two advisories and a warning for exceeding sulphur dioxide limits between 2018 and 2020.
Conuma Resources Limited, a steelmaking coal producer, has been issued two administrative penalties totaling $11,385 for failing to:
Conuma received two advisories and three warnings for the same non-compliances between 2017 and 2021.
Access the Natural Resource Compliance and Enforcement Database to find previous AP's and more details on each one issued.
These annual summaries cover the calendar year for both EMA and IPMA activities which support our mission to protect the environment by:
2023 compliance summary
2023 compliance year in review infographic (PDF, 8.8MB)
Inspections
Compliance responses
Complaints by discharge type
Administrative penalties levied totaled $17,211,591
Administrative penalties levied per sector:
An equal partnership between the environmental protection division and the conservation officer service that investigates significant complex environmental offences and pursues both prosecution and administrative enforcement responses.
4 officers responsible for:
2022 compliance summary
2022 compliance year in review infographic (PDF, 5.4MB)
Inspections
Compliance responses
Complaints by discharge type
Administrative penalties levied totaled $2,239,101
Administrative penalties levied per sector by percent:
New in 2022, this unit is an equal partnership between the environmental protection division and the conservation officer service that investigates significant complex environmental offences and pursues both prosecution and administrative enforcement responses.
3 officers responsible for:
2021 compliance summary
2021 compliance year in review infographic (PDF, 247KB)
Inspections
Complaints by discharge type
Complaints by region
Inspections
Complaints by region
For an explanation of these responses, refer to Compliance and Enforcement Policy and Procedures (PDF, 1MB)
Conducting audits on regulated parties is one of the methods the B.C. government uses to verify compliance.
For compliance audits under the IPMA, visit the Reports, publications and guides for pesticides page.
Enter your email address to subscribe to updates of this page.