There is no single correct way to connect a community. Selecting the best service delivery model and partnership structure depends upon the resources and needs of your community.
As you begin to think about the best way to connect your community, there are several important considerations to be made. These include:
This section presents the basics of the economics of broadband. It also gives an overview of the options for building and keeping a broadband network in your community. The goal is to give planners the info they need. It will start talks on the cost and possibility of broadband.
Providing internet in rural areas is hard. It's also hard in remote areas. The economics of building and running broadband networks is one key factor.
Internet service is a commercial commodity. The major carriers focus on building new infrastructure. They do this to meet rising demands and make the most of their investment.
The return on investment for broadband capital projects in rural and remote areas may make it difficult to attract private sector investment. This is due to the low number of potential customers and the physical distance that must be covered.
Like all infrastructure projects, there are two broad categories of expenses for broadband:
Most funding programs offer grants to cover the capital expenses of a broadband solution. But it is important to consider both types of expenses when planning connectivity infrastructure projects.
Communities may have different challenges. But, all face a similar economic one. Service providers decide where to build connectivity. They do this according to market signals.
Service providers will invest in connectivity infrastructure. They will do so if there is a viable business case for it. Several factors can influence the business case of a community for the deployment of broadband services:
You may want to talk to multiple carriers and service providers. You can partner with them to coordinate the best solution for your community. Major carriers may build the main infrastructure. They can work with smaller providers for the last-mile connection.
Contact the regional manager of your local service provider early in the connectivity planning process. They can help you determine what local government can do to eliminate barriers to make it cost effective for service providers to build infrastructure in your area.
It is important to understand how the policies and practices of local governments affect the economics of broadband and encourage broadband deployment.
There are many steps you can take to reduce service delivery costs and increase the potential to attract new investments in service upgrades and expansions:
Broadband networks involve three components: Infrastructure, network operations and service providers.
Each component of service delivery is essential to provide connectivity to citizens, businesses and organizations of a community. However, the owner, operator and service provider can all be different entities.
The owner of the network pays for the construction of the infrastructure. They can either operate the network themselves or they can contract and pay someone else to run the network for them.
The operator then manages and maintains the network to ensure good performance. The operator also sells access to the network infrastructure and service to service providers. All revenues are then turned into the owner.
After purchasing access to the network infrastructure from the operator, the service provider sells services to customers like internet and telephone services. They also provide customer service and tech support if needed. Service providers are the only ones having direct contact with end users, who may not even know who the owner and operator of the network are.
There is no single approach to determine who should be responsible for each component of service delivery, and there are many roles that local governments can play in broadband connectivity.
There are many roles that local governments can play in broadband connectivity. Each option is unique in its distribution of responsibilities among the participating parties.
One option is to let the market operate on its own, which is what has largely existed to date. In this case, private companies own, operate, and deliver services to residents and businesses. Another model is when local governments own and operate their own broadband networks. In between these two scenarios are various forms of partnership between local governments and private companies to share the risks and rewards of an investment in services. For example, local governments can advocate and provide support for projects, make municipal and regional assets available, offer financial support, or get involved in ownership.
​