Capital assets procured using traditional methods are financed by the Province in one of two ways:
Both traditional financing methods are discussed in greater detail below.
PCAs are issued to eligible agencies (as defined in section 56.1 of the Financial Administration Act) for the acquisition of tangible capital assets to support provincially- funded programs. To qualify for a PCA, the agency must have a claim on the asset to ensure its continued use for provincially-funded public programs.
Monies are advanced through an Electronic Fund Transfer and financed with direct government debt, which is classified by capital purpose.
PCAs are recorded on the province’s financial statements as a deferred expense and amortized over the asset’s life. The value of a PCA must never exceed the unamortized value of the tangible capital asset it was used to acquire.
As part of the PCA process, agencies may be issued Certificates of Approval (COAs) for specific projects. This gives them the authority they need to receive funds, and to draw down those funds to an established project limit.
Agencies that use the COA system should establish internal policies and procedures for its administration. These policies and procedures should accommodate local agencies’ approval requirements, if applicable, particularly in cases where legislation requires the agencies to pass bylaws before undertaking capital expenditures.
Most public-sector agency borrowing for capital needs is done through the Fiscal Agency Loan program, under which the Province borrows directly in the financial markets and re- lends funds to agencies on matching terms. The program uses the Province’s strong credit rating, and its ability to borrow at lower interest rates, to provide lower-cost financing.
In most cases, responsibility for borrowing and financing costs rests with the agency. The exception is in certain cases where the Province pays for all or part of the debt service costs.
If the fiscal agency loan is recoverable from future government appropriations, the loan is treated, for accounting purposes, as a prepaid capital advance (i.e. a deferred expense amortized over the asset’s life).
Given competing program demands, fiscal agency loans may not be appropriate for self- supporting projects, or projects projected to become self-supporting. Agencies leading these projects may be directed to obtain non-government guaranteed financing.
Alternative financing refers to the use of innovative and cost-effective funding approaches that do not add to the Province’s debt and proceed without recourse to, or guarantees from, the Province.
It is one component of alternative procurement (which is discussed in detail in Section 8.4) and may deliver benefits such as:
Alternative financing can take various forms. Commonly-used methods include:
Capital and operating leases: These allow the lessee to use an asset for a period of time, with or without full recourse to the Province in the event of default. The lease types differ primarily in their allocation of risk. In an operating lease, the lessor retains most of the risks (and rewards) of ownership. In a capital lease, substantially all the risks and rewards are transferred to the lessee.
Bonds, debentures and other securities: These may be issued directly by agencies to financial institutions and the capital markets. They are issued with recourse limited only to the project or the sponsoring agency.
These methods of alternative financing could be used in any of the following forms of alternative procurement:
Agencies are required to consult with the Provincial Treasury, Ministry of Finance, prior to embarking on alternative financing initiatives. The Provincial Treasury can provide:
These services support a co-ordinated, streamlined approach that allows:
Under the Province’s Fiscal Planning Framework, the debt of public-sector agencies is classified in three categories:
Each of these categories is discussed below, along with the criteria Treasury Board uses to determine the different classifications. These criteria parallel those applied by a major U.S. credit rating agency.
Taxpayer-supported debt includes:
Direct government debt, which funds government operations and capital advances for education, health care and public transit infrastructure.
Fiscal agency and government guaranteed loans to social and government-services agencies, which finance construction of justice facilities, government and other accommodation requirements.
Fiscal agency and government guaranteed loans to economic development agencies, which finance ferry terminal and fleet expansions, and certain public transit and highway construction projects.
Other fiscal agency loans, which finance the construction and maintenance of post- secondary residences, parking facilities and other ancillary services. These projects are supported by user fees which are not sufficient to fully recover all debt service requirements, operating and capital-maintenance costs. Loans are also provided to local improvement districts to finance infrastructure.
Loan guarantees, which are provided to private-sector firms and individuals by the government through various programs. The government obligation is contingent upon default of the primary debtor.
Non-guaranteed debt, which may be incurred directly by a taxpayer-supported agency, excluding non-consolidated institutions such as schools and health organizations.
The debt incurred for a capital project may be designated as self-supporting when it meets the following two conditions:
Self-supporting debt includes:
Off-credit financing refers to borrowing and other types of financing that do not appear in either the taxpayer-supported or self-supporting debt categories. Examples include:
11. Performance Management < Previous | Next > 13. Accounting