Learn about the responsibilities that regulatory authorities have under the International Credentials Recognition Act, and how they are kept accountable.
If an internationally trained applicant is not satisfied with the way a regulatory authority is handling their application, they may pursue any appeal processes offered through a regulatory authority’s authorizing enactment, bylaws, or policies.
It may be appropriate to file a complaint with the BC Ombudsperson if:
The Superintendent of International Credential Recognition oversees systemic and general procedural matters related to international credential assessment processes. The Superintendent does not serve as an appeal body for individual application decisions made by regulatory authorities.
Internationally trained applicants may contact the Superintendent to provide feedback about the application process. While the Superintendent cannot directly intervene in individual application matters, they may be interested in specific concerns about the application process. Applicant feedback will contribute to the Superintendent's knowledge about systemic or general procedural matters.
Regulatory authorities must submit annual reports to the Superintendent that include aggregated, depersonalized data about credential recognition processes and outcomes. These reports help the Superintendent assess whether the government's international credential recognition policy goals are being met.
Applicant feedback and data from regulatory authorities helps the Superintendent identify and address systemic issues. This information is used by the Fair Credential Recognition Office to make:
Based on these sources, the Superintendent may decide to take action to address concerns about systemic or procedural matters relating to international credential recognition processes. Compliance enforcement will follow an escalating, risk-based approach, considering factors such as:
Contact the Office for International Credential Recognition